Heuven, E. The role of self-efficacy in performing emotion work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69 , Hochschild, A.
The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press. Hofmann, D. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations.
Journal of Management, 24 , Jaccard, J. Interaction effects in multiple regression. James, L. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 , Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 , Johannessen, H. Effects of occupational role conflict and emotional demands on subsequent psychological distress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55 , Kovjanic, S. Transformational leadership and performance: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86 , Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33 , Kozlowski, S.
Work groups and teams in organizations. Borman, D. Klimoski Eds. Kranabetter, C. Managers as role models for health: Moderators of the relationship of transformational leadership with employee exhaustion and cynicism.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22 4 , Lanaj, K. Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: A daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2 , LeBreton, J. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11 , Llorens, S. Testing the robustness of job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13 , Martins, A. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between emotional intelligence and health.
Personality and Individual Differences, 49 , — Mehmood, Q. Miner, A. Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78 , Morris, J. The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21 , Nielsen, K.
Nozaki, Y. Emotional competence and extrinsic emotion regulation directed toward an ostracized person. Emotion, 15 , The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32 , Podsakoff, P. Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal Applied of Psychology, 88 , Salanova, M. Lettera Publicaciones. Schaufeli, W. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 , Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept.
Leiter Eds , Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research pp. Psychology Press. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 , How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30 , The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 , Sherdell, L.
Anticipatory pleasure predicts motivation for reward in major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, , Snijders, T. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Syrek, C. Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work-life balance.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychololy, 18 3 , Tuckey, M. Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17 , Upadyaya, K. From job demands and resources to work engagement, burnout, life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, and occupational health. Burnout Research, 3 4 , Van den Tooren, M. Explaining emotional exhaustion and work engagement: The role of job demands-resources and type D personality.
International Journal of Stress Management, 23 2 , Van Woerkom, M. Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, , Vecina, M.
Wang, M. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 , Wu, C. How transformational leadership shapes team proactivity: The mediating role of positive affective tone and the moderating role of team task variety.
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19 3 , Xanthopoulou, D, Bakker, A. Work engagement among employee facing emotional demands. The role of personal resources. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12 , Your request has been saved.
The data we compile is analysed to improve the website and to offer more personalized services. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, see our cookies policy. August Pages 87 - Abstract In service work, emotional demands are important due to their effects on social interactions with customers, patients, pupils, etc. Resumen En el trabajo de servicio, las demandas emocionales son importantes debido a sus efectos sobre las interacciones sociales con clientes, pacientes, alumnos, etc.
Palabras clave Liderazgo, Demandas emocionales, Engagement, Multinivel. Keywords Leadership, Emotional demands, Engagement, Multilevel. Introduction In recent decades, the nature of work has changed. Within this theoretical framework, we hypothesize: Hypothesis 1: Individual level effect: emotional demands are negatively related to work engagement.
Figure 1 Multilevel Relational Model. References Arnold, K. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press. Hox, J. Applied multilevel analysis. Yukl, G. Leadership in organizations. Introduction Method Results Discussion. Consider exactly what you hope to achieve and communicate your vision with staff so everyone will know the common goals you're working towards together. Strong leaders are great at setting expectations and providing praise to staff members.
You need to make sure your instructions are clear and that you're giving good feedback. If you make it a point to ensure you are communicating — even more than you might naturally feel you need to — you can see if more discussion with staff produces better results.
Different people require different kinds of motivation. Focusing on different personality traits and on how workers interact with each other will help you to find ways to personalize your leadership style in the manner most effective for each individual worker. Journal your efforts. Create a career journal where you can take note of situations you could have handled more effectively, and where you record actions you took that seemed especially effective at inspiring your staff.
The more you reflect upon what works, and what doesn't, the better developed your leadership skills will become. Take a course There are many online courses that teach leadership skills.
Sign up for a class from a respected source that sounds interesting. It's ideal if you can find a leadership course that focuses on a specific weakness of yours. Instead of relying on formal authority to get what she wanted from her team, she exercised influence by creating a culture of inquiry. Once she got the information and knew what you were doing, you had to be consistent. The more power managers are willing to share with subordinates in this way, the more influence they tend to command.
When they lead in a manner that allows their people to take the initiative, they build their own credibility as managers. Managing interdependencies and exercising informal authority derived from personal credibility require new managers to build trust, influence, and mutual expectations with a wide array of people.
This is often achieved by establishing productive personal relationships. Ultimately, however, the new manager must figure out how to harness the power of a team. Simply focusing on one-on-one relationships with members of the team can undermine that process. During their first year on the job, many new managers fail to recognize, much less address, their team-building responsibilities.
Instead, they conceive of their people-management role as building the most effective relationships they can with each individual subordinate, erroneously equating the management of their team with managing the individuals on the team.
They attend primarily to individual performance and pay little or no attention to team culture and performance. They hardly ever rely on group forums for identifying and solving problems. Some spend too much time with a small number of trusted subordinates, often those who seem most supportive. New managers tend to handle issues, even those with teamwide implications, one-on-one. This leads them to make decisions based on unnecessarily limited information.
In his first week as a sales manager at a Texas software company, Roger Collins was asked by a subordinate for an assigned parking spot that had just become available. He had been working on the assumption that if he could establish a good relationship with each person who reported to him, his whole team would function smoothly. What he learned was that supervising each individual was not the same as leading the team. Grasping this notion can be especially difficult for up-and-comers who have been able to accomplish a great deal on their own.
When new managers focus solely on one-on-one relationships, they neglect a fundamental aspect of effective leadership: harnessing the collective power of the group to improve individual performance and commitment. Like many managerial myths, this one is partly true but is misleading because it tells only some of the story. Making sure an operation is operating smoothly is an incredibly difficult task, requiring a manager to keep countless balls in the air at all times.
Often—and it comes as a surprise to most—this means challenging organizational processes or structures that exist above and beyond their area of formal authority. Only when they understand this part of the job will they begin to address seriously their leadership responsibilities.
New managers often discover, belatedly, that they are expected to do more than just make sure their groups function smoothly today.
They must also recommend and initiate changes that will help their groups do even better in the future. He also presented a proposal to acquire a new information system that could allow his team to optimize its marketing initiatives. When he could not persuade his boss to release more money, he hunkered down and focused on changes within his team that would make it as productive as possible under the circumstances.
Delhorne, shocked and hurt, thought the CEO was being grossly unfair. In fact, most new managers see themselves as targets of organizational change initiatives, implementing with their groups the changes ordered from above.
Hierarchical thinking and their fixation on the authority that comes with being the boss lead them to define their responsibilities too narrowly. But this represents a fundamental misunderstanding of their role within the organization. New managers need to generate changes, both within and outside their areas of responsibility, to ensure that their teams can succeed.
They need to work to change the context in which their teams operate, ignoring their lack of formal authority. This broader view benefits the organization as well as the new manager. Organizations must continually revitalize and transform themselves.
They can meet these challenges only if they have cadres of effective leaders capable of both managing the complexity of the status quo and initiating change. But given the multilayered nature of their new responsibilities, they are still going to make mistakes as they try to put together the managerial puzzle—and making mistakes, no matter how important to the learning process, is no fun. They are going to feel pain as their professional identities are stretched and reshaped.
As they struggle to learn a new role, they will often feel isolated. Unfortunately, my research has shown that few new managers ask for help. The insights a manager does possess come over time, through experience. And, as countless studies show, it is easier to learn on the job if you can draw on the support and assistance of peers and superiors. The same goes for sharing your problems with your superior.
The inherent conflict between the roles of evaluator and developer is an age-old dilemma. So new managers need to be creative in finding support.
For instance, they might seek out peers who are outside their region or function or in another organization altogether. The problem with bosses, while difficult to solve neatly, can be alleviated. And herein lies a lesson not only for new managers but for experienced bosses, as well. The new manager avoids turning to her immediate superior for advice because she sees that person as a threat to, rather than an ally in, her development. As one new manager reports:. He would probably have some good advice.
He may see that you are a little bit out of control, and then you really have a tough job. Such fears are often justified. Many a new manager has regretted trying to establish a mentoring relationship with his boss. What on earth did you have in mind? This is a tragically lost opportunity for the new manager, the boss, and the organization as a whole. When a new manager can develop a good relationship with his boss, it can make all the difference in the world—though not necessarily in ways the new manager expects.
My research suggests that eventually about half of new managers turn to their bosses for assistance, often because of a looming crisis. Many are relieved to find their superiors more tolerant of their questions and mistakes than they had expected.
About half of new managers turn to their bosses for assistance. Sometimes, the most expert mentors can seem deceptively hands-off. It was driving me nuts. When I asked her a question, she asked me a question. I got no answers.
0コメント